OLDE EARTH and other associated theories on the origins of man and the nature of the world.
As a thinking Christian, I find the theories of an olde earth more favorable than those of a young earth. Thus, I would see the creation account in Genesis 1 as a figuratively rather than a literally. The order of the account is correct, but a "day" was clearly much longer than a 24 hour period. The Earth is thought to be over 4 Billion years old.
The Garden of Eden was a special place on Earth where God provided man a safe and furnished environment. It was never intended to be man's eternal home in bliss. Glory in the heavenly places and the presence of God was man's ultimate destination, had he not sinned (the same places that are restored to us in Christ). Eden was only a place where man lived during his probationary period before God, so that he could be tested.
Even before man sinned, the whole world was not as in Eden. The world outside of Eden was pretty much just as it is today in nature. Carnivorous animals ate other animals, and nature took its course. Yes, death existed in nature before man sinned. No where in God's curse on Adam for sin (Genesis 3:17-19) does God say that he is introducing death to all of the world because of his sin, nor is there mention of a significant change in zoological anatomy to introduce carnivores to the animal kingdom at that time. Furthermore, the fossil records support this. Nature is as it has been from its creation.
Death was introduced to man, however, because of his sin. Spiritual death was immediate in a separation from fellowship with God, but physical death was not so immediate. It was not that physical changes occurred in man after his sin to bring on physical death (albeit up to 900 years later! Though some DNA changes may have occurred to give man a sin nature that is passed down to all progeny). Man died physically because he was barred from the Tree of Life. Everything in this universe and reality decays as described by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and that applied before man's sin. The Tree of Life had been God's provision to thwart that effect on man, however. Eternal life would have been effected by man's regular (vs. one-time?) consumption of the fruits of the Tree of Life. Since we were barred from it, our bodies, like all of the rest of nature in this universe, wind down like a spring. So, before sin, there was nothing in the human body that inherently would cause it to live forever.
What of other hominids whose fossil bones have been dug up numerously (Neanderthals and others)? They are hominids, but they are not humans = sons of Adam and daughters of Eve. Man is distinguished from these other hominids by his ability for relationship with God (as opposed to other hominids' inability for same, as are all other animals).
The Flood. One theory says that it was local (though massive) to the Middle East, effectively killing all humans (except Noah, et.al.), since humans at that time had not spread out across the world as God had told them, but had remained congregated together in cities there in the Mesopatamian region. Thus, with a regional flood, there would be no need for two of every animal on earth to come to the ark -- only those who would be affected in the area. And the archeology does confirm a large flood in the Mesopatamian area, but not all over the world.
The missing river of Eden. The Pishon River (Genesis 2:11) was one of four rivers of Eden and the one no longer localized. The other three rivers -- Euphrates, Tigris, and Ulai -- are known and thought to be those noted in Genesis 2. Satellite imagery has noted a river bed under the sands of Saudi Arabia that runs eastward from the mountains that border the Red Sea in the west of that country (in the area of Mecca and Medina) to the top end of the Persian Gulf where the other three rivers end. A good candidate for the River Pishon.
Associated sources:
A Biblical Case for an Old Earth, David Snoke, Baker Books, ISBN#0801066190.
Why the Universe Is the Way It Is, Hugh Ross, Baker books, ISBN#0801013046.
